Dear Simon Orchard… Love an official!

This week there was an article released by a top Australian player about officials and their accountability in the game. The original article can be found on UK site The Hockey Paper. In it, Simon Orchard provided his viewpoint on the role and approach that officials have in top level club, National and International hockey from his experiences as a Kookaburra.

Below is a response to Simon Orchard’s article ‘It’s time umpires learnt the game’ re-written from the perspective of an official. I hope it provides food for thought, and another side to this very complex story.

I am proud to be an official. I am part of a team, a part of a club just like any player. My club colours are fluro yellow & pink. And as dorky as my skirt and long black socks can be, I love them. I take pride in my performance on the field and I am always accountable for my game. If I make an error, you better believe that I will stew on it for the rest of the week until I get a chance to hit the field and redeem myself the next weekend.

The article written by Orchard was ignorant and self-indulgent. Umpires will make mistakes, so do players. Mistakes are how we learn. We need to work together to close the gap and realise that all of us are out there to have fun and be involved in the sport we love regardless of what level we play at.

Orchard characterises aspects of weak umpires and generalises for the whole community, ignoring that many of these same characteristics are present in the players (and even himself) who engage with umpires on the pitch.

———————

“The trouble with referees is that they know the rules, they just don’t know the game”, the great Bill Shankly once said. I have to say I agree with the former Scottish footballer and ex-Liverpool manager wholeheartedly.

“The trouble with players is that they know the game, they just don’t always understand the intent of the rules”, the great Keeley O’Reilly once said. I have to say I agree with the current Premier League umpire wholeheartedly.

Many top whistle-blowers have a general understanding of the rules of hockey. However, a large number of them severely lack the ability to consistently apply, enforce or define them in the pressure-cooker environment that can be elite sport.

Many top players have a general understanding of the rules of hockey. However, a large number of them severely lack the ability to understand that they might not have seen things correctly from their position, or that something else that they missed might have happened while they were completing an action. In a pressure-cooker environment that is elite sport, they sometimes become so focussed on their own performance that they forget that the officials and their opponents are also working just as hard to achieve perfection.

‘But without referees, we wouldn’t have ourselves a game’, I hear many say. What a cop out.

That’s just a common cliché that oh too often absolves officials of having to provide an acceptable performance.

‘But without referees, we wouldn’t have ourselves a game’, I hear many say. This isn’t true – we would, but would you want to play a lawless game of hockey? You know that people carry around long pieces of carbon fibre right? Surely you get how potentially dangerous honesty rules would be? But good luck to you wanting to play a game sans officials. I like my face, knees, shins and my expensive lump of carbon fibre too much for that.

Don’t see this piece as misguided frustration at officials, rather a plea for increased standards of officialdom across our sport. Because at the risk of sounding rather exaggerated, umpires have been the bane of my existence as a hockey player.

Don’t see this piece as misguided frustration at players, rather a plea for increased standards of player behaviour and education across our sport. Because at the risk of sounding rather exaggerated, players have been the bane of my existence as an umpire.

My weakness. My Achilles heel. My kryptonite. The only real variable that has consistently, and at times severely, distracted me from my hockey career.

I don’t even know what to say to this… Maybe you’re just letting the umpires affect your game too much. Just get on with it, like an official has to do after copping a spray from a player.

Today, I will attempt to dissect the most unrewarding role in sport, from a perspective that frequently places me in the official’s crosshairs.

Today, I will attempt to rebut the assertions made by Simon Orchard about the most unrewarding role in sport, from the perspective of someone who knows what it feels like to be screamed at, belittled and abused for making a split second decision.

It’s no secret I constantly find myself in strife with the powers that rule our game, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but don’t be fooled. I have a certain sense of disdain for many umpires, and here’s why:

It is no secret that umpires constantly find themselves in strife with the player of a game, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but don’t be fooled. I have a certain sense of disdain for many players who speak with such ignorance, and here’s why:

1) Lack of accountability

What happens after each match? Review meetings? Do they watch video of controversial decisions? Are umpires presented with feedback reports?

After every match, officials are taken into a room with their coach to discuss how the game went, strengths, weaknesses, ways to improve. They have a review meeting. Where their meager funding allows (or where they can get access to videos prepared by others that aren’t perfectly fit for purpose) they watch back controversial decisions and discuss what happened. Sometimes they are right, sometimes they aren’t. It happens. Umpires at all championships are presented with feedback reports, and they are graded and ranked.

Other sports constantly review their officials, assessing them on things like decision-making, management of players, general skill, communication, and how well they help their co-umpire.

Just like other sports, Hockey constantly reviews their officials, assessing them on things like decision-making, management of players, general skill, communication and how well they help their co-umpire.

My reasons for this train of thought are usually centred on garnering the clarity and accountability that players, coaches and spectators crave and deserve.

The umpire is aware of the importance of every single game, and every single event, and they work hard to be their best for the players, the coaches, the spectators, the sport, their co-umpire and themselves. The umpire is always aware that a poor performance will affect their ranking, score, and potentially their opportunity for future appointments. Umpires do not get three trials, and a training squad or twice-weekly pitch time, before a tournament or competition match. Mistakes or areas for improvement are played out in the competition environment, and their opportunities for their next appointment are judged solely on that.

*Exhibit A: Wave away the protests: South African players gather round to contest the umpire’s decision

2) Poor communication skills

The worst officials can’t engage with players in the right manner, some can’t engage at all. Walking onto the field with a whistle doesn’t put you on a pedestal where you are immune from acknowledging those around you in a courteous manner.

Let’s flip this a second. The worst players can’t engage with officials in the right manner, some can’t help but engage consistently throughout a match. Walking onto the field with a stick doesn’t put you on a pedestal where you are immune from acknowledging those around you in a courteous manner.

*Please now look at exhibit A, you have 3 players clearing being really ‘courteous’ to an official. Respect and courtesy is a two-way street.

In my opinion, you earn respect with how you treat and speak to the players before, during and after the match. Poor umpires will meet any questions during the match with a figurative brick wall of dialogue.

In my opinion, you earn respect with how you treat and speak to the officials before, during and after the match. Disrespectful players will not always get answers to questions in a match if they come up screaming in the officials face. A player who asks a reasonable question, in a polite way is far more likely to have an umpire listen to them, and respond. It should be noted that officials are actively encouraged to be approachable after the match, after emotion that clouds the issue can be removed.

It’s amazing how much back and forth happens in sport around the world between players and officials, which naturally helps to build rapport. Not in our world, the precious umpires of the hockey scene can’t and won’t tolerate much discussion at all.

It is amazing how back and forth happens in sport around the world between players and officials, which naturally helps to build rapport. In the hockey world, the fast-paced nature of the game means that the officials can’t do so on the pitch. As officials, we agree that conversations, not yelling matches or stony silence, are where the greatest benefit is gained from both parties. Most umpires in Australia are humans with personalities who are more than happy to engage in reasonable conversation at the appropriate time.

3) Remove the emotion and lose the ego

The biggest predicament that I believe umpires must overcome is how to remove the emotion that comes with refereeing.

The biggest predicament that I believe players must overcome is how to remove the emotion that comes with playing.

I always believe high-level players make the best umpires. They understand the game; they have a great knowledge of the rules and of how to implement them; they have dealt with the pressures associated with top-flight hockey, but most importantly, they know it feels to be playing at that level.

I tend to agree that high-level players can make great umpires. But very few of these people transition into umpiring, and the two skills are not mutually exclusive as there are plenty of amazing umpires that have never played at the top level. What is it about umpiring that prevents top players from making it as top umpires? Time and sacrifices (particularly after a demanding playing career), perhaps? A low appetite for abuse from players?.

The pressure. The stakes. The potential importance of each and every decision.

The pressure. The stakes. The potential importance of each and every decision.

The worst referees don’t understand this and tend to escalate situations, instead of defusing them. They referee with a chip on their shoulder and almost go looking for retribution, any chance to stamp their authority on a troublesome player. A big no no if you wish to maintain the status quo with both teams.

The worst players don’t understand this and tend to escalate situations, instead of just getting on with their game. They play with a chip on their shoulder and almost go looking for retribution, any chance to prove the umpire is out to get them. They get frustrated about a decision that they didn’t agree with and then take that frustration out (verbally) on the official or get distracted from their role in the team, a no-no if you want to stay on the pitch.

Make a mistake, and get chastised from pillar to post, pinned to the wall by pundits and players until your next match. Make no mistakes and just disappear into the background.

Make a mistake (as a player), and get chastised from pillar to post, pinned to the wall by pundits and umpires until your next match (oh wait. Nope, that is just umpires that get that kind of treatment). Make no mistakes, or in fact, do something amazing and no one would even acknowledge that in the dying minutes of the game you played the best advantage from the defensive 25 which actually landed the team that is 1 goal down a chance to attack and maybe even get a shot on goal or a PC. But boy did that player get a cheer.

The best umpires will help to raise the standard of the game, thus increasing the enjoyment for players and spectators.

The best umpires will help to raise the standard of the game, thus increasing the enjoyment for themselves, the players and the spectators.

This can easily be achieved if umpires do four simple things: stay accountable; communicate well; keep your emotions in check; and learn the game.

This can easily be achieved if players and umpires together do four simple things: stay accountable, communicate well, keep your emotions in check; and learn the rules and the game.

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “Dear Simon Orchard… Love an official!

  1. So true, as an umpire you can’t turn round to a player and say ‘who was that pass meant for?’ ‘You held on to that ball for far too long’ or ‘ you missed that clear shot on goal by a mile’. We don’t criticise players about how they perform during a match, but we have 22 players who feel it is their right to tell us how we perform throughout and after the match.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. 19 years TOTAL involved in our Sport and HE is an expert. Ignoramus of the highest degree.
    How little of that as an umpire?
    I’ve been involved in the sport 42 years and 33 years umpiring and the Prima-Donna player is still very much alive and kicking…. so many of our “so called” greats do nothing but bash umpires week in and week out and do NOTHING to contribute to raising the respect level for those that contribute to our sport way beyond the average player regardless of the team or standard of competition they play.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Exactly the problem with hockey. An us v them notion exists. Either umpires v players or players against umpires but it is unhealthy. An officials main goal should be to be objective and make decisions with no bias. You are clearly biased and therefore your objectivity as an official has left the building. Finally to much whistle boring game. We want to see brutal skillful contests not the umpire blowing his whistle chasing center of attention. You are support to the game not the game.

    Like

    1. …….and you obviously do not watch the game of hockey! Umpiring these days involves very little intrusion into the game. No I am not an umpire I am a player so I am not biased. The game of hockey has become so much faster and better to watch than at any time in the history of the game due to the ability of the umpires to let the game flow – the advantage is played so well by umpires. There role is not to support the game, there role is to manage the game within the rules. Do you even understand the process, regulations, training, coaching and grading process for umpires to become elite umpires? No you definitely don’t or you wouldn’t make such an uneducated statement!

      Like

  4. Simon Orchard is both absolutely right and absolutely wrong.

    He is right that umpiring in general is a shambles – that is because the Rules of Hockey are a shambles and so too is much of the “interpretation” that is foisted onto the practising umpire who wants to progress. Post match coaching and analysis of performance does not help much here because it does not address this issue, it reinforces it.

    He is wrong to attack umpires in the way he does for “ego” and “emotion”. As the article above points out all such arguments can be turned around – and we end up with a useless tit-for-tat.

    Orchard provides not a single example of the kind of umpiring incident he complains of. Perhaps he does not want to pick on a particular umpire, but the lack of examples destroys what little credibility he might have had. I was left wondering “What is he trying to achieve?” Not only does he provide no examples (despite there being no shortage of video clips of umpiring blunders) he offers no suggestions or solutions that are not already on foot – and he does not mention the content or wording of the Rules of Hockey at all, just suggests that umpires do not know the intent or purpose of them : does anybody?

    The making of mistakes and the consequences of mistakes are an area where I cannot agree with Rodney Kay. Umpire’s mistakes are their own and may earn them a ‘slap on the wrist’ and even in extreme cases downgrading or resting for a period, but in general everybody, usually including both teams of players, are hoping that the umpires have a ‘good game’ and all do what they can to ensure this.
    The consequences for making a mistake in a match can be dire for a player – the team lose the match – too many mistakes, and that may be as few as two, and a player may lose their place in the team for a season or even permanently. The umpire has everyone hoping he or she performs well, the player has eleven opponents on pitch who are doing their best to force him or her to error. Player mistakes and umpiring mistakes and the reasons for them are not the same kind of thing at all.

    The Rules of Hockey have been so buggered up since 2003 – by ‘interpretation’ and invention and also by being ignored – that the game being played is no longer recognisable as the field hockey that the FIH Rules Committee have issued those Rules for. It is little wonder there is discontent among players and nor is it surprising that the umpire – the easily available and visible presence – should be the target of this discontentment. That is not fair and umpires will respond in kind as Kay has done – the real culprits will advise that this ‘storm in a tea-cup’ be ignored and/or dismiss it as a gimmick to generate newspaper sales.

    Like

  5. I think I have ascribed the article to Rodney Kay when it was written by KEEKS-IN-HD but the correction allows me to add something to my last paragraph that slipped my mind as I was writing it. A fight has broken out between a player and a number of umpires he has upset – and both will now retreat to their respective ‘camps’ to listen to echoes of their own opinions. Players and umpires are however participating in the same game and it is way past time they got together to stop the ‘tail wagging the dog’ and got the Rules of the game sorted out.

    Like

  6. Does this article not completely justify exactly what Simon was talking about? People who have written a response supporting this article need to take a good hard look at themselves.

    Like

  7. Umpiring a simple guide for going from “No idea” to “Some idea”

    1. Watch a few games
    2. Ask those officiating to explain why they blew when they did/didn’t if you didn’t agree with a particular decisions
    3 Play a few games
    4. Only now read the rules
    5. Repeat 1 to 4
    6. Now officiate, telling both sides before the game you’re a novice, so bear with me
    7. Actively talk to players about how they thought the game went
    8. Now re-read the rules
    9. Watch a video of a game with the sound off
    10. Rewatch with the sound on
    11. Rewatch and pause and rewind after each big decision and look at where the official is
    12. Now umpire again
    13. Get to that game early, the teams are there an hour before the game warming up. It will look like you’re taking the game as seriously as they are.
    14. Talk to the players during the game as much as your communicate with your colleague
    15. Smile and shake your head after they’ve bad a poor pass, likewise compliment a good piece of skill.
    16. Umpire at all levels of the game, don’t become elitist

    Putting it simply:

    A Blow what you see not what you hear
    B Move around so you can do the first part of A and not have to rely on the second part
    C Remember with BOTH you and the players there is no game
    D Smile with and at players

    NB the best umpire to umpire me was also the worst. He got things wrong sometimes and after the game freely admitted it as well as highlighting my own short comings.

    I always knew he would blow as he saw it

    He didn’t drive but the local teams would pick him up and take him to (and in most cases) from the game. So he must have been doing something

    Not the best, but the best

    Like

    1. Nice comment. Simple but effective. But there needed to be a response to the Orchard article because we as a hockey community need to work together. Not against each other as we need the game to grow not regress.

      Like

  8. I rarely umpire, in fact have only done so once this season, but for me the main issue is not only how players speak to the umpires but just as importantly, how the umpires speak to the players. If you are lucky enough to have one that will allow you to have a conversation, particularly as the captain, it makes it much easier. If however you get one of the pompous, self important ones that won’t even acknowledge you that’s when things often spiral out of control. I’m not saying that umpires should have to tolerate the whole team screaming at them after every decision but treating players like children and waving them away is just plain rude. Just the thoughts of a cantankerous old bugger who’s been playing this game far too long!

    Like

  9. I have been watching the above videos with some interest. I am not an Elite umpire but as per Keeley HD take my role in this sport seriously. My Umpire Development Mentors consistently refer to the “NINES”. This, in my view is where an umpire gets their merit. A thorough understanding of the nines (Section 9 of the rules) should be a goal of every umpire. The problem is that there is many ways the nines are interpreted.
    The same field play manoeuvre in one of the videos is a perfect example of differing interpretations.
    I would expect that the UM of the tournament would have discussed this in the debrief afterwards. At the National and State level tournaments I have attended the debrief was, to me, as important as the game itself.

    Understanding the nines is complex and it is obvious in the videos even at high level, easily miss interpreted.

    I am a club umpire mentor and the young umpires get regular sessions on obstruction. I have my own portfolio of obstruction decisions on video and we discuss the merits of each decision.
    I took up umpiring as a result of some ordinary decisions against my son in particular. Poor umpiring at club level was endemic then. Now, due to some intelligent decisions by the association the overall standard of umpiring in this state has improved out of sight, and will continue to do so in the coming years.

    This discussion/ blog will affect the way umpires(Those who are following it) react. Some will choose not to learn and some like Keeley HD will make every effort to be better at what they do.

    This is human nature.

    My advice.. Obtain a thorough appreciation for the nines. No matter what level you umpire.

    And enjoy what you do.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s